TakeOnIt
Compare opinions of world leading experts and influencers.
Welcome to TakeOnIt, a website for comparing opinions of experts, leaders and organizations. All opinions here are expressed in the form of answering a yes-no question, creating a virtual debate. You can contribute by quoting an expert opinion or adding your own opinion.

Top Experts & Influencers

Top Comparisons

Top Pitches

Top Topics

Top Contributors

Rationality Websites

TakeOnIt Blog

Recently Added Issues

Recently Added Quotes

Cynical types view all politicians as power-hungry morally bankrupt two-faced sociopaths, while more optimistic types see them as generally good people who try their best in difficult jobs. Partisans often believe the best about their own party and the worst about the other. Others try to sidestep the question by suggesting that politicians be judged purely on their results, while others believe that good leadership requires good character. Others blame the system rather than the people.
For those who lie on the extreme ends of the capitalist/socialist spectrum, the answer is black and white. For those who favor a balance between the two ideals, there is a threshold at which redistributing wealth from the rich to do the poor may be unfair (assuming the rich deserve their wealth), or may actually hurt poor people (assuming the rich skillfully manage the job-creating businesses and investments they own). Has that threshold been crossed?
It's common to believe one can and should "change the world", and certainly leaders commonly espouse such an attitude, reminding us of how "each little drop counts". However, some pragmatists argue such idealism is futile, and that blind optimism only makes life more difficult for oneself. The pragmatists tend to view the matter quantitatively, reasoning that the negative effect on oneself far outweighs the positive effect on others, if indeed one is having a positive effect at all.
Anders Breivik is responsible for the 2011 Norway Attacks, killing 76 people. The knee-jerk assessment of his personality is that he's insane, but is this actually the case? Is evil possible without insanity?
Debate in Australia rages over whether the current Labor Government plan to spend $37 billion on a National Broadband Network (NBN) is the best use of the Government resources. The ruling Labor party on the advice of their experts won the 2010 election under the mantra: Do it once, do it right, do it with fibre. The NBN will roll fibre to the home (FTTH) to 93% of Australian homes, and all towns with more than 1,000 premises, and supply wireless or satellite to the rest.
Hypnosis is a psychological procedure for entering an altered state of consciousness, most notably one that is unusually open to suggestion. Hypnotherapy is used for psychotherapy or performance enhancement, while stage hypnosis is used for entertainment. The theatrical nature of stage hypnosis - whereby a member of an audience will believe and do anything - such as walking around clucking like a chicken - has caused some skeptics to doubt whether hypnosis is a real phenomenon at all.
Religious people and even scientists sometimes claim that science is ultimately just a matter of faith, based on unproven assumptions. The argument is used to cast doubt on all scientific beliefs, as well as demonstrating that scientific attacks on religion are ultimately not only impotent but furthermore hypocritical.
Critics of feminism suggest that the movement that once gave birth to positive changes such as emancipation has since soured. The goal of equal rights has allegedly now become simply a desire to dominate men, often under the guise of victimhood. Many feminists vehemently deny such allegations, often citing evidence of the continued suppression of women, such as inequality in wages.
Popularized by movies such as the Matrix, the simulation argument states that the physical world as we know it is actually running on a simulation. Is this argument science or science-fiction?
Robin Hanson
This seems to me a common situation – things said to be critiques of capitalism are often just critiques of humanity. Humans vie selfishly and self-deludedly for status. Some succeed, while others fail. The struggle, and the failures, aren’t pretty. Yes capitalism inherits this ugliness, but then so does any other system with humans.
Conservapedia
Modern feminists... never wanted gender equality; they want power for the female left
Conservapedia
It is a commonly held belief of evolutionists that small changes in genetic materials (mutations) will ultimately produce the presumed large changes necessary for one biological organism to change into a different kind of biological organism which is commonly called macroevolution. This belief is not valid.
Conservapedia
Studies indicate that homosexual couples have higher rates of promiscuity than heterosexual couples. Allowing gays to marry would make gays seek more partners.
Conservapedia
Abortion always ends the life of the unborn child, typically by dismemberment. Abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, future premature birth, mental illness, and other long-term health problems for the mother, as detailed below. Sometimes women die from abortion.
Conservapedia
Abortion always ends the life of the unborn child, typically by dismemberment. Abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, future premature birth, mental illness, and other long-term health problems for the mother, as detailed below. Sometimes women die from abortion.
Conservapedia
The fossil record does not support the theory of evolution and is one of the flaws in the theory of evolution.
Conservapedia
What happened is a huge, major shift, from the old order of 1,000 years of persecution, of dictatorship, of religious supremacy, of prosecuting minorities, to a completely new order, which is called democracy, human rights, accountability, and transparency, and all this.
Conservapedia
Historically, capitalism has fostered freedom and an increase in the standard of living and human rights, and vice versa. Societies that have tried non-capitalist systems inevitably fall into tyranny.
Ron Paul
I get to my God through Christ. Christ to me, is a man of peace. He is for peace.
Ron Paul
In the last 30 years, we have spent hundreds of billions of dollars on a failed war on drugs. This war has been used as an excuse to attack our liberties and privacy. It has been an excuse to undermine our financial privacy while promoting illegal searches and seizures with many innocent people losing their lives and property. Seizure and forfeiture have harmed a great number of innocent American citizens.

New Comments

-1 Point       odinslefteye       03 May 2012     Is rebirth/reincarnation plausible? Agree
Blackmore does not know what she is talking about. Her understanding of Buddhism is crude at best Buddhist thought thoroughly refutes our attempts to attain permanence, independence, and self-subsistence by identifying with transient, conditioned phenomena, material, psychological, or conceptual. To understand the his one as to understand the doctrine of dependent origination. Both Carrol and Blackmore made there reputation as defenders of the reductionist paradigm and as skeptics.

Buddha expressly denied nihilism. He stated essentially that the self we experience is an illusion because we reify subject and object. What is reborn is reborn every second the notion that there is a body that dies and is born is an illusion. Carrols book of reincarnation was idiotic. For someone who studied Sanskrit classical Chinese and Buddhism for fifty years to hear such gibberish as Blackmore's is painful.. To say that individual self does not exist as a real abiding thing,is to say waves on the ocean do not have an abiding permanent self. They arise and disappear as conditions arise and disappear,but the Ocean remains, and conditions never cease to occur. The karmic energy that was the wave will reform as conditions ripen again. Therefore it is not a permanent self separate form the ocean and not annihilated with its transitions.

0 Points       Lord       02 May 2012     Is the earth approximately 6000 years old? (as opposed to 4.5 billion) General Comment
So you're a Diest?

1 Point       Nick       29 Apr 2012     Is it plausible that we're living in a simulation? Agree
Many answers to this question are making mistaken assumptions about what needs to be simulated.

Firstly the size of the problem is overestimated: A simulation need only model the things around you in detail and not even many of those. There is absolutely no reason to suppose that anything beyond ones immediate perception and point in time need be simulated. Much like a dynamically evolving computer game the scene outside your front door need only be generated when you open the door. You believe that there is consistency over time but it that need not be so - From a programming point of view it is simpler to just say "memoryOfOutside := currentSimulation" and your simulated mind would never notice.

Regarding time: People are ignoring the fact that time itself would be simulated. This is actually one of the main points of the simulations that we ourselves do - climate simulations run faster than real time and microprocessor simulations run slower, much slower. (Simulations can even be paused indefinitely whilst someone models new information such as me opening my front door as above).

We are also being very narrow minded when we imagine simulations running on what are essentially bigger better versions of the computers that we have now. Who are we to say what the computers of the future may be like or to say that they would not include chemical and nuclear reactions. In "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" Douglas Adams would have us believe that the earth and everything on it are essentialy a computer designed to calculate the meaning of life etc. The idea is comical but why should it not be true?

A final thought on religion: If one believes that God created the from nothing then by any reasonable definition God is playing SimUniverse right now.

1 Point       Nick       29 Apr 2012     Is there life after death? Disagree
A big problem with this question is that it is too vague.
Surprisingly(?) few people are willing to pin down exactly what they mean by life after death. This is probably because once made explicit most positions are either easy to shoot down or make the question worthless.

It is difficult to tease all the problems apart but here are a few:

Those who believe that we are effectively frozen as we were at death are going to have a big problem with children or people with alzheimers dying. The rational man would presumably then kill himself whilst in his late 20s.

Those who believe that people have no bodies in the afterlife just don't understand that we don't "have" bodies - We "are" bodies. An afterlife without a body is not a human afterlife.

Those who believe that there is some eternal soul that passes on or is recycled may well be right but if we do not carry our memories then there is no value in the afterlife.

Those who believe that the afterlife is just a big party or sitting around basking in god's love are just ignoring human nature - It is human to compete and to get bored.

In summary there is either no afterlife or at least none that interests me.

0 Points       Tabetha       28 Apr 2012     Did Michael Jackson molest children? Disagree
NO! Michael Jackson was not a fucking child molestor. Here's what i've noticed whenever someone like Michael comes on this earth, they sacrifice their life for us in some way and then when they needed us the most, we put a knife in their back to where they can't get it out, inspite of everything they've done for us eventually we would hate them. The one thing we love more than a hero is to see one fall and suffer until they're dead, oh but see once they do die all of a sudden we love them; I don't think people like Michael belong here.

1 Point       HUGE Ya Ya       25 Apr 2012     Should abortion be legal? General Comment
You've eaten a carrot? Murderer! It's made up of a bunch of cells!

Lala you carrot slayer carrots have rights you know eating carrots is a HUGE no-no Lala! GOD said.

Fuck the unborn/carrots. Rights ONLY for lifeforms WITH developed brains. Is Lala worried? That lala no brain lala no rights? That would be a logical deduction; quite beyond da Lala.

Threat: a Lala-Fetus-Carrot smoothie.

I'll go through with it unless someone is willing to adopt the carrot.

I'm serious.

I have a peeler.

1 Point       Christian       25 Apr 2012     Is the earth approximately 6000 years old? (as opposed to 4.5 billion) General Comment
Just want to make a point here. Revelations actually says that a singld day is as a thousand years to God. It would actually set the worlds age to be over that of 12,000 years old. As far as these athiests are concerned God has given them over to a reprobate mind. Their type has always been around and their type is always the first to beg for a drop of water while they burn in hell. Unrepetant, dilluded, and content with living in their foolish ways of thinking. They would be so foolish as to believe a theory that is only over a hundred and forty years old as opposed to the knowledge and wisdome passed down over thousands of years. Also as for most of your substantial scientific discoveries and cures for diseases you can thank Christians. Oh you can also thank them for your right to speak the dribble you proclaim and lies you promote. They died so that you can choose what you want to believe. Im sure it was their hope that our future generations would have been much smarter than they turned out but unfortunately one cannot predict the future. Oh wait..Christians can through the power of Christ and the Holy Word of God. Man I bet that just gets you athiests all riled and hungry for blood.

0 Points       SECGEM       24 Apr 2012     Should abortion be legal? Disagree
Abortion is not a solution to early pragnancy,there are many options to deal with an unwated pregnanacy or early pregnancy.Abortion is qual as murder,because you are killing an innocent baby,which u think is not precoius to you.but in the first place if you never wanted to get pregnant why you have sex? A baby is a God given pursue happiness and you have to accept it as one.

1 Point       Radio Gaga       19 Apr 2012     Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class? Disagree
"I don't get it."
That's understandable.
Like :-)

I have to debate about this topic in school (in English and not in science) and I don`t find many arguments for Intelligent Science.
My personal belief is that Intelligence Design should not be taught in science class because seperation of Church and State is an achievement made just two centuries ago. There`s no reason to condemn it now.
I don`t think Intelligence Design is a proper scientific theory. Darwin has some arguments which sound more convincing and logical to me.

-1 Point       Foxfire0002       18 Apr 2012     Is science ultimately just a matter of faith? Agree
Even so, you have faith that your experiences of the past will translate into the future experiences of taking the drug. Just because the sun has risen in the past does not mean it will rise in the future. You have faith that it will rise based on past experiences, and faith that there is high probability that it will of it rising.

0 Points       Haruka       14 Apr 2012     Is abortion morally acceptable? General Comment
Does having fingernails have anything to do with being alive?
>_< not a good reason

-1 Point       Haruka       14 Apr 2012     Does God exist? Neutral
I am completely neutral. I am non-religious as well.
There is no proof that God exists.
There is also no proof that he doesn't.
Religion is just something for people to rely on, so I say believe whatever you want!