TakeOnIt
Compare opinions of world leading experts and influencers.
 

Steven Chu

US Energy Secretary, Nobel Laureate in Physics

Steve Chu is the energy secretary for President Barack Obama, and a Nobel Laureate in physics. He was previously the Director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and a Professor of Physics and Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California (UC), Berkeley. He is also one of the nation’s foremost and outspoken advocates for scientific solutions to the twin problems of global warming and the need for carbon-neutral renewable sources of energy.

Experts Most Alike:

John Deutch   Chemistry Professor 87% Agreement / 2
Joseph Romm   Physicist, Environmentalist, Writer 75% Agreement / 2

Experts Least Alike:

Ralph Nader   Politician, Consumer Activist 12% Agreement / 2
David Bellamy   Botanist, Documentarian 25% Agreement / 1

Steven Chu's Opinions

Mostly Disagree
... After 60 years of research we are not yet close. The most optimistic researchers predict that maybe in 40 or 50 years, commercial energy sources based on nuclear fusion may become possible. At the present, nuclear fusion remains a research program. We should continue to do research in fusion, but we cannot put all our eggs in one basket.
08 Jul 2005    Source


Mostly Agree
There are stronger and stronger indications that global warming is happening, that it's caused by humans, and its consequences are looking more and more ominous. You can draw a parallel to the early days of [research into] cigarette smoking, the '50s and '60s, where scientists said, "Hey, there seems to be a link between lung cancer and cigarette smoking."
30 Sep 2005    Source


Agree
[Should fission-based nuclear power plants be made a bigger part of the energy-producing portfolio?] Absolutely. Right now about 20 percent of our power comes from nuclear; there have been no new nuclear plants built since the early '70s. The real rational fears against nuclear power are about the long-term waste problem and [nuclear] proliferation.
30 Sep 2005    Source


Mostly Agree
Right now, compared to conventional coal, [the risk-benefit equation looks pretty good for nuclear. The question is] - what are the lesser of two evils? But if we can reduce the volume and the lifetime of the [nuclear] waste, that would tip it very much against conventional coal.
30 Sep 2005    Source


Disagree
I deeply believe that in my heart and soul, that science, when put to the task, can and will I think give us much better energy solutions. [For example,] an early crisis Europe faced at the beginning of the transition from the 19th to the 20th century was [that] the constant agriculture on pieces of land depleted the soils..... And so what happened was, German chemists invented a way to synthesize ammonia, which became the basis of nitrogen fertilizer [and] got a Nobel Prize for that.
09 Mar 2009    Source


Neutral
Although President-elect Obama and others have voiced opposition to Yucca based on concerns over safety, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, whose job it is to make such determinations, is currently reviewing the Department of Energy's application to build Yucca. It should be allowed to carry out its mission.
29 Jan 2009    Source


Comparisons to Other Experts

Agree
John Deutch
Chemistry Professor
87% / 2 opinions

Kevin Rudd
Australian Prime Minister, 2007-
100% / 1 opinions

Bill Gates
Microsoft Cofounder, Philanthropist
100% / 1 opinions

Mostly Agree
John McCain
U.S. Senator, Republican
62% / 2 opinions

Joseph Romm
Physicist, Environmentalist, Writer
75% / 2 opinions

Barack Obama
United States President
62% / 2 opinions

Hillary Clinton
US Secretary of State 2009-, Democrat
62% / 2 opinions

World Nuclear Association
(WNA)
75% / 1 opinions

Michael Oppenheimer
Physics Professor, IPCC Lead Author
75% / 1 opinions

John Christy
Climatology Professor, Former IPCC Lead Author
75% / 1 opinions

In-Between
S. Fred Singer
Head of NIPCC, Astrophysics Professor
50% / 1 opinions

Joe Biden
US Vice President, Democrat
50% / 1 opinions

Harry Reid
Senator, Nevada, Democrat
50% / 1 opinions

Robert Hirsch
Energy Policy Analyst
50% / 1 opinions

International Energy Agency
(IAE)
50% / 1 opinions

Jasper Kirkby
Particle Physicist
50% / 1 opinions

Roy Spencer
Meteorologist
50% / 1 opinions

Monte Hieb
Mining Engineer
50% / 1 opinions

Mostly Disagree
David Bellamy
Botanist, Documentarian
25% / 1 opinions

Robert Carter
Marine Geophysical Professor
25% / 1 opinions

Global Warming Petition Project
Petition
25% / 1 opinions

Sarah Palin
Former Governor of Alaska (Republican)
25% / 1 opinions

Matthew Simmons
CEO and Oil Analyst
25% / 1 opinions

Wal van Lierop
CEO of Chrysalix Energy Venture Capital
25% / 1 opinions

Michele Bachmann
US Politician, Republican
25% / 1 opinions

Denis Rancourt
Physics Professor
25% / 1 opinions

B.P. Radhakrishna
Geologist, President of the Geological Society of India
25% / 1 opinions

Tom Segalstad
Geology Professor
25% / 1 opinions

Disagree
Ralph Nader
Politician, Consumer Activist
12% / 2 opinions

Caroline Lucas
English Politician, Green Party
0% / 1 opinions