Compare opinions of experts, leaders and organizations.
Questions
Experts
Discussions
How It Works
Send Feedback
Sign Up
Login
Does evolution violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics?
Topics:
Evolution
Religion
Physics
Science
Background
The 2nd law of thermodynamics states that entropy increases over time, or that a closed system moves from an ordered state to a random state. Critics of evolution suggest that life itself is prima facie proof that evolution is flawed, since the opposite appears to be happening - life has evolved from primordial soup to sophisticated creatures like ourselves. Defenders of evolution say that this objection is based on a misunderstanding of entropy.
Implications
Related Questions
Edit
Does evolution violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics?
Logically, if
Agree
then
Disagree
with
Did complex life evolve through the process of natural selection?
Could a supercollider create a black hole that sucks up the earth?
7
Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
6
Is the theory of evolution falsified by fossil evidence?
2
Must God exist to explain complex life forms?
1
Add Expert Opinion
Edit Question
Delete
History
Know of an expert who has publicly stated an opinion on this matter? Add them.
Expert Opinions
What's Your TakeOnIt?
Disagree
Answer
Expert
Quote
Date
Disagree
Frank Steiger
Engineer
The creationist position would necessarily discard the entire mathematical framework of thermodynamics and would provide no basis for the engineering design of turbines, refrigeration units, industrial pumps, etc. It would do away with the well-developed mathematical relationships of physical chemistry, including the effect of temperature and pressure on equilibrium constants and phase changes.
01 Jan 1995
Source
Disagree
Edward A. Morris
Born Again Christian, Software Engineer
I am amazed at how many Christians claim that the theory of evolution violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This can be clearly shown to be false. There may well be some good, valid arguments against evolution, but claiming that it violates the Second Law is not one of them.
06 May 2001
Source