Compare opinions of experts, leaders and organizations.
Questions
Experts
Discussions
How It Works
Send Feedback
Sign Up
Login
Does Iraq possess weapons of mass destruction?
Topics:
Iraq
Middle East Politics
War
Background
The primary stated reason the US Government gave for going to war with Iraq was to rid the country of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). This includes nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. These weapons were never found, and many questions were raised regarding the failure of US intelligence.
Implications
Related Questions
Edit
Does Iraq possess weapons of mass destruction?
Possibly, if
Disagree
then
Disagree
with
Should the United States invade Iraq?
Can the US military presence in Iraq help create democracy?
6
Is oil a motivation for maintaining a military presence in Iraq?
4
Would invading Iraq result in a quagmire?
4
Are Iraqis better off since Saddam's regime was toppled?
4
Add Expert Opinion
Edit Question
Delete
History
Know of an expert who has publicly stated an opinion on this matter? Add them.
Expert Opinions
What's Your TakeOnIt?
Agree
Answer
Expert
Quote
Date
Agree
Dick Cheney
Politician, US Vice President 2001-2008
There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.
26 Aug 2002
Source
Agree
Hillary Clinton
U.S. Senator, Democrat
In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. ...if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase [his arsenal]. Should he succeed in that endeavor he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.
10 Nov 2002
Source
Agree
Colin Powell
Former U.S. Secretary of State
We know that Saddam is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction; he's determined to make more. Given Saddam's history of aggression, given what we know of his grandiose plans, given what we know of his terrorist associations and given his determination to exact revenge on those who oppose him, should we take the risk that he will not some day use these weapons at a time and the place and in the manner of his choosing at a time when the world is in a much weaker position to respond?
05 Feb 2003
Source
Disagree
Answer
Expert
Quote
Date
Disagree
13myths.org
Liberal Activist Website
There is no credible evidence that Saddam Hussein's scientists are now working on nuclear weapons, even though Hussein has wanted them in the past.
04 Mar 2003
Source
Mostly Disagree
Mohamed ElBaradei
Director of International Atomic Energy Agency
We have to date found no evidence that Iraq has revived its nuclear weapons programme since the elimination of the programme in the 1990s. However, our work is steadily progressing and should be allowed to run its natural course. With our verification system now in place, barring exceptional circumstances, and provided there is sustained proactive cooperation by Iraq, we should be able within the next few months to provide credible assurance that Iraq has no nuclear weapons programme.
27 Jan 2003
Source