|
|
Recently Added Issues |
Recently Added Quotes |
|
|
|
1 Point
MTC
23 Feb 2013
Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Disagree
No, because it isn’t science.
If you want to teach in RE class (for Americans reading this: Religious Education (RE) is a mandatory class in some British schools intended to teach about various types of religion [whether RE should exist is a separate question]) that some people believe it, then fine, but it has no place whatsoever in a science classroom. |
|
1 Point
Radio Gaga
19 Apr 2012
Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Disagree
That's understandable. Like :-) I have to debate about this topic in school (in English and not in science) and I don`t find many arguments for Intelligent Science. My personal belief is that Intelligence Design should not be taught in science class because seperation of Church and State is an achievement made just two centuries ago. There`s no reason to condemn it now. I don`t think Intelligence Design is a proper scientific theory. Darwin has some arguments which sound more convincing and logical to me. |
|
0 Points
Benja
23 Nov 2011
Are people getting stupider?
General Comment
|
|
0 Points
Nashhinton
23 Nov 2011
Are people getting stupider?
Mostly Disagree
According to the Flynn effect, people living across the world are dramatically increasing their IQ. The reason for this is possibly because of an increase in online education or better nutrition for people living in 3rd world nations. However, I would say that willful ignorance is more rampant and more abundant than ever before. But of course, ignorance and intelligence are two different things.
By the way isn't a word. |
|
1 Point
Nashhinton
21 Nov 2011
Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Disagree
Intelligent design is mainly a form of religious creationism, and if it were taught in public schools (which are government owned institutions) it would violate the separation of church and state found in the first amendment of the united states constitution.
|
|
-1 Point
Al Bikaadi
12 Sep 2011
Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Agree
Evolutionary Theory is science, true. What is science? It is based on observation and hypothesis, measurement and analysis. Given that there is no such thing as undiluted immediate objectivity, it is clearly not the only conclusion to be had by these processes. Intelligent Design is a different conclusion from the same processes. It should absolutely be included in the science classroom!
|
|
1 Point
J. Ripley
02 Sep 2011
Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Disagree
is not a THEORY. It isn't even an HYPOTHESIS. It is a religious belief. A theory is a statement that is based on observational data that can be reproduced by any observer in a lab or observational location. An hypothesis is not raised to the level of a theory until it can be demonstrated over and over and over again to be valid in all situations of testing and observation. Religious beliefs should be personal and not be imposed upon others.
|
|
1 Point
Keller Scholl
27 May 2011
Is it important to fit in with your peer group?
General Comment
At the risk of coming from a personal example that fails to generalize, I will explain how I see and use this principle.
There is a difference between and fit in with. Among the friends who share my penchant for discovery and debate, I count a right wing Christian conservative and a pastafarian programmer. I don't, unless I am consciously making an effort to change my behaviour, fit in with my friends. But we have some commonality strong enough to bind us, and that allows us to have different experiences, while getting along. And sadly, yes, many people I am friendly with don't share that attitude. More generally: Sharing one attitude does not entirely determine When all of your friends are upper class protestant kids with liberal/conservative politics similar to your own, you should be terrified. When all of your friends agree with you on a single thing and you have not consciously selected for that thing, you should be worried. The key difference is conscious selection. I know that I select my friends, at least partially, for their tolerance and interest in discussion. I value that trait. If I found that all of my friends were liberal in social issues and mixed on economic ones, despite me not selecting for that, I would be more worried but not unduly terrified, as I have found a correlation among people I have dealt with between inquiry, tolerance, and liberal politics. If I found all my friends were upper class, I would stop, halt, and catch on fire. What you know you will be biased by hurts you less. If you find selecting for a trait to be worth the benefit/induction of bias tradeoff, it is acceptable. What is bad is doing so without considering the tradeoff, or doing so without even realising there is something off about it. |
|
0 Points
Benja
27 May 2011
Is it important to fit in with your peer group?
General Comment
At the risk of coming across as overly facetious, the irony here is that if your friends all shared this admirable attitude that you have, you'd fit in quite nicely with your peer group. |
|
1 Point
Keller Scholl
27 May 2011
Is it important to fit in with your peer group?
Disagree
It is important to have a group. They shouldn't be chosen by age, or whom your mother likes, or who your dad, but by who you find yourself enjoying time with and finding common ground with. I agree with the importance of having a group, and having them be your for whatever you value in life, can be a good thing.
But fitting in with your peer group simply displays a worrisome lack of critical thought, reinforces current biases and stereotypes, and makes it harder for you to learn because the people you are dealing with have little to teach you because they are so like you. I disagree with my friends frequently, respectfully, and honestly. They come from different places, are in different places, and have different stories from me. We are not each other, because a world made of clones would be boring. I try to find unique individuals, who are different from me. Race, class, gender, philosophy, extroversion, intellectualism, ect, all can be important differences that give us a chance to learn. Having a friend who is exactly like me is a waste of both of our times. It is important to have some common ground for effective communication, but no more than what is needed should be looked for. |
|
1 Point
pineconedegg
25 Mar 2011
Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?
Disagree
Nonscientific theories should not be taught as science. The gaps in evolution do not imply Intelligent Design any more than the gaps in our understanding of gravity imply Intelligent Falling.
|
|
1 Point
Michelle
11 Mar 2011
Does the media distort our perception of beauty?
Mostly Agree
Thought you might enjoy this video make about how the media influences our perceptions on beauty. The video was made for a media class.
http://mfjs2210.wordpress.com/2011/03/08/beauty-pressure-media-culture/ |
|
0 Points
Benja
18 Jul 2010
Is creativity overrated?
Editorial Comment
Maybe: it more combines than entangles those questions, with the debate on this issue dependent on there being a difference between the value society puts on creativity and the value one thinks society should put on creativity.
|
|
1 Point
JGWeissman
17 Jul 2010
Is creativity overrated?
Editorial Comment
This question is hard to answer because it entangles two more basic questions:
How valuable is creativity? How much, in general, does society value creativity? |