TakeOnIt
Compare opinions of world leading experts and influencers.

Science

God

Can science prove or disprove the existence of God?
People who believe in God generally believe that a purely analytical and scientific method of forming knowledge is constrained to a subset of reality that cannot encompass God. Atheists on the other hand, typically say that God is merely one of numerous theories that lack coherence and supporting evidence, and that these shortcomings already constitutes sufficient proof of God's non existence.
Benja on 21 Dec 2009 added the opinion of:
Austin Cline
Eliezer Yudkowsky
and 6 hours ago gave their opinion.
Packbat on 09 Jan 2010 added the opinion of:
Paul Z. Myers
and 7 hours ago gave their opinion.
and on 09 Jan 2010 gave their opinion.
Matarael on 09 Jan 2010 gave their opinion.

Is free will an illusion?
The belief that we control our decisions is seemingly undermined by the fact that the future is an inevitable consequence of the past. When we put our foot on a car's accelerator, we know that this causes chemical combustion in the car, and that the car has no choice but to go faster. Similarly, the putting of our foot on the accelerator was also caused by chemical combustion - one in our own brains. For this reason, many philosophers and scientists regard free will as illusionary.
JGWeissman on 08 Mar 2010 added the opinion of:
Eliezer Yudkowsky
and on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.

Is cryonics worthwhile?
Cryonics is the preservation of an animal by cooling with the hope that future medical advances can revive that animal. Modern cryonics make use of cryopreservatives to minimize cellular damage caused by freezing, particularly to the brain. Advocates of the procedure typically believe that so long as the critical structure of the brain is preserved, a person could one day be brought back to life.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Benja on 08 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Alcor Life Extension Foundation
Cryogenic Society of America
Ben Best
Invisible Flan
Eliezer Yudkowsky
Andrew Stark
Bryan Caplan
Benjamin Franklin
Robin Hanson

Is the world explainable without God?
Many religious thinkers do not find a purely scientific account of the universe plausible. Areas where the scientific explanation is questioned include the universe's origin, life on earth, human consciousness, and human morality.
JGWeissman on 08 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.

Is there life after death?
One of the major clashes between the scientific world view and religious world views, is that science does not support a belief in life after death. Christianity and Islam regard life as preparation for judgement at death, which will determine one's fate in the afterlife. Judaism regards death as not the end, but is much less focused on the afterlife than life itself. Buddhism and Hinduism believe in continual rebirth until enlightenment is attained.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Steve on 01 Dec 2009 added the opinion of:
Albert Einstein
Praveen on 13 Nov 2009 gave their opinion.

Is the earth approximately 6000 years old? (as opposed to 4.5 billion)
There are two contradictory accounts of the age of earth. One is the scientific account, which claims that the earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old. The other is a biblical account, which claims that the earth is approximately 6000 years old. The scientific position is that there is overwhelming evidence for their view, while Christian Science points to contradictions and anomalies in that position.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.

Do we have an immaterial soul?
The belief in an immaterial soul requires that central aspects of a person, such as consciousness, memories, and personality, are not contingent upon our physical bodies. The concept was first formalized in western philosophy by Rene Descartes in the 17th century, who proposed that our soul interacts with our body via the pineal gland in the brain. That theory has since been rejected by mainstream science.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.

Cryonics

Is deterioration of the brain after death slow enough for cryonics to be worthwhile?
Shortly after death, the brain starts deteriorating due to blood circulation stopping. For cryonics to be practical, there must be a sufficient window of time between legal death and information-theoretic death (when vital structure in the brain is lost), in which cryonic preservation must take place. Skeptics of cryonics claim that as in little as 5 minutes of ischemia (a restriction of blood flow), the brain is irreversibly damaged.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Benja on 09 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Maxim Persidsky
Ben Best

Does cryonic preservation with today's best technology cause irreversible brain damage?
There are a number of companies today that charge for cryopreserving a body (or just a head) immediately after death. To minimize damage from freezing, the dead bodies are injected with cryopreservatives. A vital question is whether this process protects the critical neural structures in the brain. If not, then the process is by anyone's criteria a waste of time, since "information-theoretic death" will have occurred.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Benja on 08 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
João Pedro de Magalhães
Ralph Merkle
Ben Best

Is the IPCC objective?
The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a scientific body formed by the United Nations in 1988 to summarize research on climate change for the purpose of informing policy makers. Those who are skeptical of anthropogenic global warming have questioned the objectivity of the organization.
Steve on 25 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Roy Spencer
Sarah Palin
RealClimate
The Economist
maverick on 11 Dec 2009 added the opinion of:
Roger Pielke

Do negative feedback loops mostly cushion the effect of atmospheric CO2 increases?
The earth's climate is a system that contains feedback loops. If an input variable changes in a feedback loop, it effects the system in a way that changes the input variable itself. These changes cumulatively increase in a positive feedback loop, but progressively dampen in a negative feedback loop. The concern with increasing CO2, is that more CO2 in the atmosphere will warm the earth, in turn causing more CO2 to be released due to effects such as warmer oceans, i.e. a positive feedback loop.
Benja on 23 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Bill Gates

Is global warming caused primarily by humans?
Since the industrial revolution, humans have been emitting greenhouse gases that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) believe are responsible for Global Warming. While the majority of climatologists agree with the IPCC's conclusions, skeptics suggest that the IPCC's climate models are flawed and that recent climate changes should be attributed to natural causes.
Peace, Hope, Love on 29 Jan 2010 gave their opinion.

Will the 2007 IPCC computer models make accurate predictions?
The earth's climate is described with GCMs (General Circulation Models or Global Climate Models). GCMs are complex, containing many input variables and positive and negative feedback loops. These models are simulated on supercomputers to create predictions. The IPCC's predictions are based on an aggregate assessment of several GCMs.
Glenn Rowe on 20 Dec 2009 added the opinion of:
Freeman Dyson

Is the data that climate models are based on reliable? (e.g. temperature records)
Climate models require input data from many sources, such as the temperature of the atmosphere and ocean around the globe. While recent history affords us direct measurements, such as by satellite, more distant history requires indirect measurements, such as those derived from examining ice-cores and tree-rings. Some skeptics claim that data the climate models are based on is both insufficient and unreliable.
Benja on 11 Dec 2009 added the opinion of:
RealClimate

Are prediction markets the most accurate way to aggregate expert predictions?
Prediction markets allow people to bet money on predictions, with the purpose of providing more accurate predictions for policy and business analysts. Prediction markets are often contrasted with alternative methods used to tap collective intelligence, such as expert committees. Advocates of prediction markets claim that prediction markets are more accurate than their alternatives, but are underutilized due to irrational concerns regarding their accuracy, as well as susceptibility to subversion.
Benja on 27 Jan 2010 added the opinion of:
Justin Wolfers
Paul Hewitt
Science
Matthew Yglesias
Willy Aspinall
Robin Hanson

Are social networking sites good for society?
Social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter are amongst the most popular destinations on the web. No doubt in some cases this has contributed to Internet Addiction Disorder, but have they on the whole had a positive effect in our lives?
porter2010 on 20 Jan 2010 gave their opinion.
HoustonSEOExpert on 14 Jan 2010 gave their opinion.

Was the collapse of the twin towers only physically possible by controlled demolition?
Skeptics of the conventional account of the collapse of the twin towers suggest that their fall was not physically possible except by timed explosives.
Badassack on 12 Sep 2009 gave their opinion.

Cancer

Does smoking cause cancer?
The belief that smoking causes cancer is supported through both epidemiological studies and research into the underlying mechanisms by which smoking damages the body. Skeptics suggest that the epidemiological studies are biased, and that the underlying mechanisms are not yet properly understood.
Benja on 15 Dec 2009 added the opinion of:
Philip Morris
Stephen Hecht
Robin Hanson
Peter Finch
US Department of Health & Human Services

Do hotter global climates have more extreme weather patterns?
The IPCC's Global Climate Models (GCMs) predict that hotter climates will have more extreme weather patterns, such as hurricanes.
maverick on 11 Dec 2009 added the opinion of:
Roger Pielke

Is homosexuality natural?
Opponents of gay rights assert that homosexuality is a recent sickness of society that has temporarily upset our natural heterosexual state of being. Gay advocates retort that this claim is demonstratively false, since homosexuality occurs frequently in many species. Furthermore, they point out that the question is irrelevant due to the "Appeal to Nature" fallacy, which lures people into concluding that if something is unnatural or outside of the norm then it isn't good.
milkfloatgunner on 26 Nov 2009 gave their opinion.

Evolution

Did complex life evolve through the process of natural selection?
The theory of evolution is that life evolves as organisms randomly mutate, where the ones with traits best adapted to their environment survive and reproduce their successful mutations. Soon after Charles Darwin proposed this theory in the book "On the Origin of Species" in 1859, it became widely accepted by the scientific community. Its truth is central to modern biology and it remains the only scientific theory that could explain complex life without a creator.
Benja on 09 Mar 2010 added the opinion of:
Eliezer Yudkowsky
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Steve on 18 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Kent Hovind

Is humanity likely doomed to destroy itself?
Modern civilization has only emerged over the last few thousand years. Our successes have been accompanied by risks. Our population growth has also damaged our environment, and our wondrous technology has also created terrible weapons. Cynics suggest that the very engine of our success will likely be humanity's doom.
JGWeissman on 07 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Benja on 04 Mar 2010 added the opinion of:
Martin Rees
Nick Bostrom
Robin Hanson

Does evolution violate the second law of thermodynamics?
The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy increases over time, or that a closed system moves from an ordered state to a random state. Critics of evolution suggest that life itself is prima facie proof that evolution is flawed, since the opposite appears to be happening - life has evolved from primordial soup to sophisticated creatures like ourselves. Defenders of evolution say that this objection is based on a misunderstanding of entropy.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Packbat on 09 Jan 2010 added the opinion of:
Paul Z. Myers
and on 09 Jan 2010 gave their opinion.
ratiocinator on 09 Dec 2009 gave their opinion.

Is the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics correct?
The many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics says that a quantum event doesn't have a single random outcome, but rather all possible outcomes, meaning that each event splits the universe into multiple divergent universes that exist in parallel.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Steve on 11 Jan 2010 added the opinion of:
Peter Woit
Eliezer Yudkowsky
Roger Penrose
Max Tegmark
Steven Weinberg

Artificial Intelligence

Is a technological singularity likely?
A technological singularity is a super-human intelligence made possible by technological advances. Several technologies are potentially heading in this direction, the most notable being artificial intelligence, but also others such as computer-brain interfaces and genetic engineering. Such an intelligence could in turn create an even greater intelligence, leading to an explosive, unpredictable, but undoubtably radical change to society.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Benja on 27 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Ray Kurzweil
Douglas Hofstadter
Jeff Hawkins
Robin Hanson
Steven Pinker
Eliezer Yudkowsky

Is information-theoretic death the most real interpretation of death?
Information-theoretic death is defined as the moment when the neural structures in your brain are destroyed. At that point, it becomes theoretically impossible to bring a person back to life. Some philosophers and scientists regard this as a more real interpretation of death than legal death.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Benja on 08 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Robert Todd Carroll
Eliezer Yudkowsky
Bryan Caplan
Ralph Merkle

Could a computer ever be conscious?
Consciousness, or our awareness of ourselves and the world around us, is central to our existence. Fascinatingly, it is also notoriously difficult to define. Is it unique to humans or other living creatures, or could robots one day have it to?
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Benja on 25 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Jeff Hawkins
Bryan Caplan
John Searle
Packbat on 09 Jan 2010 gave their opinion.
Steve on 20 Dec 2009 added the opinion of:
Robin Hanson

Futurism

Is cryonic restoration technically feasible in the future?
Cryonic researchers speculate that scientific advances, particularly in nanotechnology, will make it possible to reanimate a cryonically suspended human being.
JGWeissman on 06 Mar 2010 gave their opinion.
Benja on 08 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
K. Eric Drexler
Ben Best
Michael Shermer
Robert Todd Carroll
John Bischof
Ralph Merkle

Are we prepared for a pandemic?
A pandemic is an outbreak of an infectious disease, like an epidemic, but of continental or global magnitude. They can be caused by either a virus or a bacteria - the Black Plague of the 14th century which killed at least a third of Europe's population is believed to have been a bacteria. Despite advances in sanitation and medicine, we could still be vulnerable.
Benja on 23 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Bill Gates

Do the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks?
A vaccine is a weakened form of a pathogen that our body can use to train its immune system without having to suffer negative health effects. Vaccination programs have radically reduced the number of deaths from infectious diseases, including diphtheria, measles, mumps, and rubella. Nonetheless, some skeptics avoid vaccinating themselves and their children, concerned with the potential risks of vaccines.
Benja on 23 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Bill Gates

Will solar be the biggest energy source of the future?
Theoretically, the sunlight hitting the surface of the earth amply meets human energy requirements. A 92-by-92-mile square grid in the Southwest of the United States could generate enough electricity for the entire country. However, some doubt whether solar energy sources can be constructed cheaply and quickly enough to significantly replace other energy sources. In addition, to meet base load demands, solar innovation must be coupled with substantial innovations in energy storage.
Benja on 23 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Bill Gates

Nuclear Energy

Does nuclear energy require a significant amount of fossil fuel?
A common argument used by opponents of nuclear energy is that a significant amount of coal is required in the overall process of producing nuclear energy. This argument is not treated seriously by nuclear advocates, partly on the basis that the amount of fossil fuel energy used in the process is a tiny fraction of the amount of energy produced, and furthermore that there is nothing about the process that requires that energy input to be based on fossil fuels.
Steve on 15 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
World Nuclear Association
Caroline Lucas
Ralph Nader

Happiness

Is optimism rational?
Optimism is an attitude where a person believes things will generally turn out well, often with the assumption that the mindset is self-fulfilling. In contrast, realists (often viewed by optimists as pessimists) tend to believe that the optimists' wishful thinking leads to broken expectations and bad consequences.
Lisa on 01 Feb 2010 added the opinion of:
Roger Federer
Oprah Winfrey
Joseph Forgas
Barbara Ehrenreich
Benja on 25 Jan 2010 added the opinion of:
Robin Hanson
Susan Webber
Michael Shermer
Winston Churchill
Conan O' Brien

Is self-deception a fault?
Many philosophers and psychologists embrace self-knowledge as a life quest, recommending its benefits to others. In popular culture, it is epitomized by Dr Phil's famous self-help catch phrase: "Get Real!". However, the belief that lying to ourselves is detrimental to our well being is far from ubiquitous. In fact, some experts believe that self-deception is necessary for a healthy mind.
Benja on 10 Jan 2010 added the opinion of:
Tyler Cowen
Eliezer Yudkowsky

Extraterrestrial Life

Is intelligent extraterrestrial life common in our galaxy?
Currently, Earth is the only planet in the universe known to have life. The ongoing SETI program monitors electromagnetic radiation from outer space in the hope of detecting an intelligent signal.
jeetender on 18 Jan 2010 gave their opinion.
Steve on 04 Jan 2010 added the opinion of:
Max Tegmark

Conspiracy Theories

Have aliens from outer space visited Earth?
The belief that aliens have visited Earth is based on countless sightings of UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects), reports of alien abductions, and other mysterious phenomena such as crop circles. Skeptics believe the evidence for these claims is weak.
Benja on 11 Jan 2010 added the opinion of:
Robin Hanson
Summer on 08 Jan 2010 added the opinion of:
Edgar Mitchell

Is modest marijuana use detrimental to your health?
While even NORML (a non-profit organization promoting the legalization of Marijuana) agrees that excessive marijuana use is unhealthy, there is debate as to whether infrequent use is innocuous.
Steve on 30 Nov 2009 added the opinion of:
Joel W. Hay
WebMD
Office of National Drug Control Policy


All Questions on Science

Is the theory of evolution falsified by fossil evidence?
Did complex life evolve through the process of natural selection?
Is the earth approximately 6000 years old? (as opposed to 4.5 billion)
Is free will an illusion?
Is genetically modified food safe to eat?
Is a technological singularity likely?
Is global warming caused primarily by humans?
Does evolution violate the second law of thermodynamics?
Are the causes of climate change well understood?
Have aliens from outer space visited Earth?
Is humanity likely doomed to destroy itself?
Could a supercollider create a black hole that sucks up the earth?
Is intelligent extraterrestrial life common in our galaxy?
Should robots always be used instead of humans for space exploration?
Do ghosts exist?
Is the earth at the center of the solar system?
Do negative feedback loops mostly cushion the effect of atmospheric CO2 increases?
Does atmospheric CO2 cause significant global warming?
Do the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks?
Are we prepared for a pandemic?
Is cryonics worthwhile?
Is there life after death?
Do we have an immaterial soul?
Can the E-Meter measure "mental energy"?
Does nuclear energy require a significant amount of fossil fuel?
Does smoking cause cancer?
Is the IPCC objective?
Will the 2007 IPCC computer models make accurate predictions?
Is substantially reducing CO2 emissions worthwhile?
Does homosexuality threaten the stability of society?
Could a computer ever be conscious?
Can science prove or disprove the existence of God?
Will solar be the biggest energy source of the future?
Does God exist?
Is information-theoretic death the most real interpretation of death?
Is the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics correct?
Are people who reject theories as unscientific closed minded?
Does astrology work (is personality correlated with the positions of celestial bodies at birth)?
Does homosexuality have a significant genetic component?
Was the moon landing a hoax?
Is self-deception a fault?
Can modest marijuana use cause depression?
Does marijuana get more dangerous with its potency?
Are social networking sites good for society?
Is the world explainable without God?
Was the collapse of the twin towers only physically possible by controlled demolition?
Does sun exposure cause skin cancer?
Is optimism rational?
Is cryonic restoration technically feasible in the future?
Is deterioration of the brain after death slow enough for cryonics to be worthwhile?
Does cryonic preservation with today's best technology cause irreversible brain damage?
Are prediction markets the most accurate way to aggregate expert predictions?
Is the data that climate models are based on reliable? (e.g. temperature records)
Do hotter global climates have more extreme weather patterns?
Will the world's supply of indium run out within 20 years?
Is modest marijuana use detrimental to your health?
Should there be a ban on models that are too skinny?
Is fusion power feasible as the next major energy source?
Does belief in God have a significant genetic component?
Can a mental state such as stress cause baldness?
Do sunscreens work?
Is sunscreen toxic?
Is a tan healthy?
Does cosmic radiation significantly affect earth's climate?
Have solar cycles significantly affected earth's recent climate?
Is homosexuality natural?
Are humans responsible for ozone depletion?
Have the IPCC computer models made good predictions up to 2007?
Was there life on Mars?
Can life adapt to a warmer earth?
Would a rise in global temperature catastrophically increase sea levels?
Do miracles happen?
Is radioactive dating accurate?
Is rebirth/reincarnation plausible?
Should research on stem cells from human embryos be banned?
Have humans stopped evolving genetically?
Is time travel possible?
Is second hand smoke a significant safety concern?
Would a hurricane in New Orleans cause thousands of deaths?
Is a "Theory of Everything" that unifies quantum mechanics and general relativity possible?
Does money make you happy?
Are there 500 Eskimo words for snow?
Is singing ability primarily a function of technique (as opposed to anatomy)?
Is labelling of "free range" chicken products misleading?
Are free range chickens happier than their caged cousins?
Does ozone therapy work?
Does the Scared Straight program deter criminal behavior?
Is stretching either before or after exercise beneficial?
Does water dowsing work? (a.k.a water divining)
Does tooth whitening toothpaste work?
Is the Myers-Briggs personality test meaningful?
Is regular running bad for your joints long term?
Do all women have a G spot?
Does relative wealth make us happier than absolute wealth?
Does obesity have a significant genetic component?
Are growth hormones in dairy cattle a human health risk?
Are recent climate changes consistent with anthropogenic global warming theory?
Are biofuels good?
Will aging be "cured"?