|
Can science prove or disprove the existence of God?
People who believe in God generally believe that a purely analytical and scientific method of forming knowledge is constrained to a subset of reality that cannot encompass God. Atheists on the other hand, typically say that God is merely one of numerous theories that lack coherence and supporting evidence, and that these shortcomings already constitutes sufficient proof of God's non existence.
|
Benja
on 21 Dec 2009
added the opinion of:
and
6 hours ago
gave their opinion.
|
Packbat
on 09 Jan 2010
added the opinion of:
and
7 hours ago
gave their opinion.
and
on 09 Jan 2010
gave their opinion.
|
Matarael
on 09 Jan 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
|
Is free will an illusion?
The belief that we control our decisions is seemingly undermined by the fact that the future is an inevitable consequence of the past. When we put our foot on a car's accelerator, we know that this causes chemical combustion in the car, and that the car has no choice but to go faster. Similarly, the putting of our foot on the accelerator was also caused by chemical combustion - one in our own brains. For this reason, many philosophers and scientists regard free will as illusionary.
|
JGWeissman
on 08 Mar 2010
added the opinion of:
and
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Is cryonics worthwhile?
Cryonics is the preservation of an animal by cooling with the hope that future medical advances can revive that animal. Modern cryonics make use of cryopreservatives to minimize cellular damage caused by freezing, particularly to the brain. Advocates of the procedure typically believe that so long as the critical structure of the brain is preserved, a person could one day be brought back to life.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Benja
on 08 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Is the world explainable without God?
Many religious thinkers do not find a purely scientific account of the universe plausible. Areas where the scientific explanation is questioned include the universe's origin, life on earth, human consciousness, and human morality.
|
JGWeissman
on 08 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Is there life after death?
One of the major clashes between the scientific world view and religious world views, is that science does not support a belief in life after death. Christianity and Islam regard life as preparation for judgement at death, which will determine one's fate in the afterlife. Judaism regards death as not the end, but is much less focused on the afterlife than life itself. Buddhism and Hinduism believe in continual rebirth until enlightenment is attained.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Steve
on 01 Dec 2009
added the opinion of:
|
Praveen
on 13 Nov 2009
gave their opinion.
|
|
Is the earth approximately 6000 years old? (as opposed to 4.5 billion)
There are two contradictory accounts of the age of earth. One is the scientific account, which claims that the earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old. The other is a biblical account, which claims that the earth is approximately 6000 years old. The scientific position is that there is overwhelming evidence for their view, while Christian Science points to contradictions and anomalies in that position.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Do we have an immaterial soul?
The belief in an immaterial soul requires that central aspects of a person, such as consciousness, memories, and personality, are not contingent upon our physical bodies. The concept was first formalized in western philosophy by Rene Descartes in the 17th century, who proposed that our soul interacts with our body via the pineal gland in the brain. That theory has since been rejected by mainstream science.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
|
Is deterioration of the brain after death slow enough for cryonics to be worthwhile?
Shortly after death, the brain starts deteriorating due to blood circulation stopping. For cryonics to be practical, there must be a sufficient window of time between legal death and information-theoretic death (when vital structure in the brain is lost), in which cryonic preservation must take place. Skeptics of cryonics claim that as in little as 5 minutes of ischemia (a restriction of blood flow), the brain is irreversibly damaged.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Benja
on 09 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Does cryonic preservation with today's best technology cause irreversible brain damage?
There are a number of companies today that charge for cryopreserving a body (or just a head) immediately after death. To minimize damage from freezing, the dead bodies are injected with cryopreservatives. A vital question is whether this process protects the critical neural structures in the brain. If not, then the process is by anyone's criteria a waste of time, since "information-theoretic death" will have occurred.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Benja
on 08 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Is the IPCC objective?
The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a scientific body formed by the United Nations in 1988 to summarize research on climate change for the purpose of informing policy makers. Those who are skeptical of anthropogenic global warming have questioned the objectivity of the organization.
|
|
Steve
on 25 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
maverick
on 11 Dec 2009
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Do negative feedback loops mostly cushion the effect of atmospheric CO2 increases?
The earth's climate is a system that contains feedback loops. If an input variable changes in a feedback loop, it effects the system in a way that changes the input variable itself. These changes cumulatively increase in a positive feedback loop, but progressively dampen in a negative feedback loop. The concern with increasing CO2, is that more CO2 in the atmosphere will warm the earth, in turn causing more CO2 to be released due to effects such as warmer oceans, i.e. a positive feedback loop.
|
|
Benja
on 23 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Is global warming caused primarily by humans?
Since the industrial revolution, humans have been emitting greenhouse gases that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) believe are responsible for Global Warming. While the majority of climatologists agree with the IPCC's conclusions, skeptics suggest that the IPCC's climate models are flawed and that recent climate changes should be attributed to natural causes.
|
Peace, Hope, Love
on 29 Jan 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Will the 2007 IPCC computer models make accurate predictions?
The earth's climate is described with GCMs (General Circulation Models or Global Climate Models). GCMs are complex, containing many input variables and positive and negative feedback loops. These models are simulated on supercomputers to create predictions. The IPCC's predictions are based on an aggregate assessment of several GCMs.
|
|
Glenn Rowe
on 20 Dec 2009
added the opinion of:
|
|
Is the data that climate models are based on reliable? (e.g. temperature records)
Climate models require input data from many sources, such as the temperature of the atmosphere and ocean around the globe. While recent history affords us direct measurements, such as by satellite, more distant history requires indirect measurements, such as those derived from examining ice-cores and tree-rings. Some skeptics claim that data the climate models are based on is both insufficient and unreliable.
|
|
Benja
on 11 Dec 2009
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Are prediction markets the most accurate way to aggregate expert predictions?
Prediction markets allow people to bet money on predictions, with the purpose of providing more accurate predictions for policy and business analysts. Prediction markets are often contrasted with alternative methods used to tap collective intelligence, such as expert committees. Advocates of prediction markets claim that prediction markets are more accurate than their alternatives, but are underutilized due to irrational concerns regarding their accuracy, as well as susceptibility to subversion.
|
|
Benja
on 27 Jan 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Are social networking sites good for society?
Social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter are amongst the most popular destinations on the web. No doubt in some cases this has contributed to Internet Addiction Disorder, but have they on the whole had a positive effect in our lives?
|
porter2010
on 20 Jan 2010
gave their opinion.
|
HoustonSEOExpert
on 14 Jan 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
|
Does smoking cause cancer?
The belief that smoking causes cancer is supported through both epidemiological studies and research into the underlying mechanisms by which smoking damages the body. Skeptics suggest that the epidemiological studies are biased, and that the underlying mechanisms are not yet properly understood.
|
|
Benja
on 15 Dec 2009
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Is homosexuality natural?
Opponents of gay rights assert that homosexuality is a recent sickness of society that has temporarily upset our natural heterosexual state of being. Gay advocates retort that this claim is demonstratively false, since homosexuality occurs frequently in many species. Furthermore, they point out that the question is irrelevant due to the "Appeal to Nature" fallacy, which lures people into concluding that if something is unnatural or outside of the norm then it isn't good.
|
milkfloatgunner
on 26 Nov 2009
gave their opinion.
|
|
|
|
Did complex life evolve through the process of natural selection?
The theory of evolution is that life evolves as organisms randomly mutate, where the ones with traits best adapted to their environment survive and reproduce their successful mutations. Soon after Charles Darwin proposed this theory in the book "On the Origin of Species" in 1859, it became widely accepted by the scientific community. Its truth is central to modern biology and it remains the only scientific theory that could explain complex life without a creator.
|
|
Benja
on 09 Mar 2010
added the opinion of:
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Steve
on 18 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Is humanity likely doomed to destroy itself?
Modern civilization has only emerged over the last few thousand years. Our successes have been accompanied by risks. Our population growth has also damaged our environment, and our wondrous technology has also created terrible weapons. Cynics suggest that the very engine of our success will likely be humanity's doom.
|
JGWeissman
on 07 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Benja
on 04 Mar 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Does evolution violate the second law of thermodynamics?
The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy increases over time, or that a closed system moves from an ordered state to a random state. Critics of evolution suggest that life itself is prima facie proof that evolution is flawed, since the opposite appears to be happening - life has evolved from primordial soup to sophisticated creatures like ourselves. Defenders of evolution say that this objection is based on a misunderstanding of entropy.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
Packbat
on 09 Jan 2010
added the opinion of:
and
on 09 Jan 2010
gave their opinion.
|
ratiocinator
on 09 Dec 2009
gave their opinion.
|
|
|
Is the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics correct?
The many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics says that a quantum event doesn't have a single random outcome, but rather all possible outcomes, meaning that each event splits the universe into multiple divergent universes that exist in parallel.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Steve
on 11 Jan 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Is a technological singularity likely?
A technological singularity is a super-human intelligence made possible by technological advances. Several technologies are potentially heading in this direction, the most notable being artificial intelligence, but also others such as computer-brain interfaces and genetic engineering. Such an intelligence could in turn create an even greater intelligence, leading to an explosive, unpredictable, but undoubtably radical change to society.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Benja
on 27 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Is information-theoretic death the most real interpretation of death?
Information-theoretic death is defined as the moment when the neural structures in your brain are destroyed. At that point, it becomes theoretically impossible to bring a person back to life. Some philosophers and scientists regard this as a more real interpretation of death than legal death.
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Benja
on 08 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Could a computer ever be conscious?
Consciousness, or our awareness of ourselves and the world around us, is central to our existence. Fascinatingly, it is also notoriously difficult to define. Is it unique to humans or other living creatures, or could robots one day have it to?
|
JGWeissman
on 06 Mar 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Benja
on 25 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
Packbat
on 09 Jan 2010
gave their opinion.
|
|
Steve
on 20 Dec 2009
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Are we prepared for a pandemic?
A pandemic is an outbreak of an infectious disease, like an epidemic, but of continental or global magnitude. They can be caused by either a virus or a bacteria - the Black Plague of the 14th century which killed at least a third of Europe's population is believed to have been a bacteria. Despite advances in sanitation and medicine, we could still be vulnerable.
|
|
Benja
on 23 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Do the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks?
A vaccine is a weakened form of a pathogen that our body can use to train its immune system without having to suffer negative health effects. Vaccination programs have radically reduced the number of deaths from infectious diseases, including diphtheria, measles, mumps, and rubella. Nonetheless, some skeptics avoid vaccinating themselves and their children, concerned with the potential risks of vaccines.
|
|
Benja
on 23 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Will solar be the biggest energy source of the future?
Theoretically, the sunlight hitting the surface of the earth amply meets human energy requirements. A 92-by-92-mile square grid in the Southwest of the United States could generate enough electricity for the entire country. However, some doubt whether solar energy sources can be constructed cheaply and quickly enough to significantly replace other energy sources. In addition, to meet base load demands, solar innovation must be coupled with substantial innovations in energy storage.
|
|
Benja
on 23 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Does nuclear energy require a significant amount of fossil fuel?
A common argument used by opponents of nuclear energy is that a significant amount of coal is required in the overall process of producing nuclear energy. This argument is not treated seriously by nuclear advocates, partly on the basis that the amount of fossil fuel energy used in the process is a tiny fraction of the amount of energy produced, and furthermore that there is nothing about the process that requires that energy input to be based on fossil fuels.
|
|
Steve
on 15 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Is optimism rational?
Optimism is an attitude where a person believes things will generally turn out well, often with the assumption that the mindset is self-fulfilling. In contrast, realists (often viewed by optimists as pessimists) tend to believe that the optimists' wishful thinking leads to broken expectations and bad consequences.
|
|
Lisa
on 01 Feb 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Benja
on 25 Jan 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Is self-deception a fault?
Many philosophers and psychologists embrace self-knowledge as a life quest, recommending its benefits to others. In popular culture, it is epitomized by Dr Phil's famous self-help catch phrase: "Get Real!". However, the belief that lying to ourselves is detrimental to our well being is far from ubiquitous. In fact, some experts believe that self-deception is necessary for a healthy mind.
|
|
Benja
on 10 Jan 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Have aliens from outer space visited Earth?
The belief that aliens have visited Earth is based on countless sightings of UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects), reports of alien abductions, and other mysterious phenomena such as crop circles. Skeptics believe the evidence for these claims is weak.
|
|
Benja
on 11 Jan 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
Summer
on 08 Jan 2010
added the opinion of:
|
|
|
Is modest marijuana use detrimental to your health?
While even NORML (a non-profit organization promoting the legalization of Marijuana) agrees that excessive marijuana use is unhealthy, there is debate as to whether infrequent use is innocuous.
|
|
Steve
on 30 Nov 2009
added the opinion of:
|
|
|